Adds GET /marketing/wallet-transactions/:id/trace (docs/prd-point-coin.md
F7, §8.1, PC-404).
From any ledger row of the organization, the trace lists the lots a debit
took from, with how much it took from each, or the lots a credit created.
Each lot is followed back through origin_lot_id, across transfers,
exchanges and refunds, to the lot an EARN, ADJUSTMENT or MIGRATION first
created. Every step shows the lot and the row that created it, with the
real name of the customer it belongs to, so the example of §8 (A sends 120
to B, B pays 30) leads from B's payment to A's order #ORD-1.
Lots are loaded a generation at a time, and a chain stops at 100 steps or
at a lot it has already seen, which only bad data could cause. A row of
another organization answers 404.
The dashboard's wallet view now builds its lots with the same helper.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds GET /customer/wallet/transfer/recipient?phone= and
POST /customer/wallet/transfer (docs/prd-point-coin.md F5, Q4, Q16,
PC-402).
The recipient is found by phone number and must be an active customer of
the same organization, not the walk-in customer and not the sender. A
number of another organization answers 404 like an unknown one, so the
check does not reveal who uses the app elsewhere. The recipient check
returns the name and number masked ("Bu*** Sa***", "08**-****-1234").
The organization's transfer settings apply: transfers turned off, the
minimum, the maximum per transaction and the daily limit per currency,
which starts over at midnight WIB. Everything the request alone can get
wrong is refused before the PIN, so it costs no attempt; the PIN then
refuses a transfer held for 24 hours after a PIN reset.
Both wallets are locked in customer_id order, so transfers in opposite
directions cannot deadlock, and the daily limit is summed under the lock.
TRANSFER_OUT takes from the sender's lots in K9 order and TRANSFER_IN
gives the recipient lots with exactly the same expiries, pointing back at
the sender's lots. The rows share a group, reference each other and name
the other customer; descriptions carry only the masked name.
The Idempotency-Key header is required. A retry is recognised under the
lock before the daily limit, so it replays instead of counting twice; the
same key towards another recipient is refused.
The recipient is told by WhatsApp after the commit, as PIN locks are:
NotificationService only reaches staff devices, there is no push channel
to customers yet. A failure to send is logged, never undoes the transfer.
Transfers must not be released before note N3 (legal) is closed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds GET /customer/wallet/exchange/preview?coins= and
POST /customer/wallet/exchange (docs/prd-point-coin.md F4, K3, PC-401).
The customer exchanges a multiple of the organization's coin_amount and
gets (coins / coin_amount) x point_amount EnakPoint, approved by their PIN
(K8). A malformed amount is refused before the PIN is checked, so it costs
no attempt. In one transaction the wallet is locked, EXCHANGE_OUT takes the
EnakCoin in K9 order and EXCHANGE_IN adds the EnakPoint; the two rows share
a group, point at each other and both freeze the rate in their metadata.
The EnakPoint are split over the EnakCoin lots they came from, each part
keeping its lot's expiry and pointing back at it, so exchanging cannot
extend a balance's life. The split takes floor(coins so far x rate) per
lot, which adds up exactly because the total is a multiple of coin_amount.
EnakPoint have no validity of their own until the expiry model is decided
(N4), so the EnakCoin lot is for now the only bound.
The Idempotency-Key header (or X-Idempotency-Key) is required. A retry
with the same key is recognised under the wallet lock and replayed with
the ids and rate the first attempt froze, even if the rate has changed
since; the same key for another amount is refused.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds POST /customer/orders/:id/pay-with-points (docs/prd-point-coin.md F9,
PC-306) for the customer app and self-order. It uses the same payment path
as the cashier, approved by the customer's PIN instead of a code: the
session alone is not enough (K8), and a wrong PIN takes nothing and counts
toward the lock.
A customer can pay only their own order; any other order, and one that
does not exist, answer 404 alike, so the endpoint does not reveal other
customers' orders. The method is the organization's EnakPoint method, no
cashier is recorded, and settling the order triggers earning through the
same onOrderPaid hook as every other payment.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds paying with the EnakPoint method (docs/prd-point-coin.md F9, K7,
PC-305).
POST /payments with the EnakPoint method now takes points and the
customer's payment code and goes through PointPaymentProcessor instead of
the generic path, which would record a payment without taking any balance.
After checking the order, its customer (not walk-in, active), the outlet
(accepts EnakPoint, minimum) and the method, it redeems the code, then in
one transaction locks the order row and the wallet, recomputes the F9
limits from fresh data, inserts the payment with points_used and the frozen
point_value, writes the PAYMENT ledger row (key payment:{id}, the outlet,
the cashier) and updates the order. The limits are
min(balance, floor(min(remaining, total × max_payment_percent / 100 − paid
with EnakPoint) / point_value)) in cents, so EnakPoint never pays more than
what is left and gives no change.
Unlike the generic CreatePayment, which always marks the order paid, an
EnakPoint payment leaves it partial with the right remaining amount until
it is settled, so the rest can be paid in cash. Settling it triggers
earning, whose basis leaves out the EnakPoint part. Splitting with the
EnakPoint method is refused. Refusals answer 400. The payment response
carries points_used and point_value for the receipt.
GET /orders/:id/point-payment/preview returns eligibility, balance, point
value and the maximum for the use-maximum button.
The payment and order repositories write outside transactions, so this
path uses its own repository that joins it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds POST /customer/wallet/payment-code (docs/prd-point-coin.md F9, K8,
PC-304). The customer approves with their PIN on their own phone and gets a
6-digit code, as digits and as a QR payload (enakpoint:<code>) for the app
to render, valid for two minutes. The PIN is never typed at the cashier.
Codes are drawn from crypto/rand and stored in Redis with SET NX and a TTL,
bound to the customer; a new code retires the previous one. Redeeming is a
single Lua step that uses the code up only if it belongs to the order's
customer, so it stays one-time under a race, and a cashier scanning it
against the wrong order does not burn it for its owner, which a plain
GETDEL would. Expired, used, unknown and other customers' codes are all
refused alike.
Tests run against miniredis, added as a test dependency.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds GET and PUT /marketing/loyalty-settings and GET
/marketing/loyalty-settings/history (docs/prd-point-coin.md F2, PC-302).
The settings are the point value, the exchange rate, transfer limits and
the stored expiry settings. PUT merges the body like the outlet settings
and is limited to loyalty managers. Every response carries the impact of
the change on the balances in circulation: outstanding EnakPoint and
EnakCoin, their rupiah value, and the coins exchanged into points, before
and after. With ?dry_run=true nothing is saved and the response lists the
keys that would change, for the warning shown before saving.
Saving records each change in loyalty_setting_changes with who made it;
history can be filtered to one outlet. Changing the value leaves what was
already written alone. The diff behind saving and previewing is shared.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the 6-digit customer PIN that approves every action moving EnakPoint
or EnakCoin on the customer's request (docs/prd-point-coin.md K8, F11, Q16,
Q17, PC-301).
Migration 000093 adds the PIN columns to customers and the
customer_security_events table. PIN data is read and written only through
CustomerPinRepository, never the Customer entity, so the hash cannot reach
a customer response. Only a bcrypt hash is stored.
- /customer/pin: status, OTP (pin_setup, pin_reset), create, change,
reset. The OTP must be for that purpose and sent to the customer's own
number; the existing OTP validation checks neither. A new PIN is checked
(6 digits, confirmed, not one digit, not a run up or down, not the birth
date as DDMMYY or YYMMDD) before the OTP is spent.
- Five wrong attempts in a row lock the PIN for 30 minutes; the counter is
incremented in one statement so attempts at the same time all count,
and a lock that ran out starts a new series. A locked PIN is refused even
when right. The customer is told by WhatsApp, as there is no push channel
to customers yet; only the attempt that reached the limit alerts.
- A reset through OTP lifts the lock and holds outgoing transfers for 24
hours; paying and exchanging still work, and a held transfer costs no
attempt.
- VerifyPin(ctx, customer, pin, action) for the flows that follow, with
PIN_NOT_SET, PIN_INVALID (attempts left), PIN_LOCKED and
TRANSFER_BLOCKED (until when), which PinErrorResponse turns into
distinct codes and statuses.
- DELETE /marketing/customers/:id/pin (loyalty managers, reason required)
and GET /marketing/customers/:id/security-events, scoped to the
organization.
Every PIN event is in the security log with IP and user agent. No message
or binding error contains a PIN.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds GET and PUT /outlets/:id/loyalty-settings (docs/prd-point-coin.md F1,
PC-201) on top of the typed settings processor.
The response shows every setting with its default when unset, the
organization's point value, and the effective EnakPoint cashback
(earn_value × point_value / earn_per_amount), so an owner cannot misread
the scale. PUT applies the body on top of the current settings: fields left
out keep their value, null clears an optional limit, and unknown fields are
refused so a typo cannot be ignored silently. The read-only fields of the
GET response are accepted and ignored, so a client can send back what it
received. It returns the keys that changed. Values outside the F1 bounds
answer 400, and an outlet of another organization 404.
RequireAdminOrManager also lets the purchasing role through, so loyalty
settings and the manual wallet adjustment from PC-107 now use a stricter
RequireLoyaltyManager (superadmin, admin, manager, owner).
Adds a test that registers every route, since gin panics at startup when
two routes name the same path parameter differently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
efrilmandClaude Opus 5.5